It’s Probably a Bubble, But There Is Plenty Else to Invest In (Ben Inker)
gmo.com · 2025-11-21 · tier T1
Source: Letter · gmo.com dated 2025-11-21. Auto-generated factual summary. Not investment advice. Verify before acting.
GMO's Ben Inker argues that AI-related stocks exhibit classic bubble characteristics, with the S&P 500 trading near its 2000 Internet Bubble valuation peak on multiple measures including CAPE, price/sales, and price/book. Inker frames the current environment as most analogous to the 2000 Internet Bubble rather than the 2007-8 Everything Bubble or the 2021 Duration Bubble, because non-U.S. equities, deep value stocks, and liquid alternatives still offer reasonable expected returns independent of whether AI is a bubble. He argues that an 'agnostic investor' — one uncertain whether a bubble exists — can build a diversified portfolio that avoids meaningful AI exposure without sacrificing long-run expected returns. GMO's Benchmark-Free Allocation Strategy, currently allocated roughly 50% stocks, 28% liquid alternatives, and 20% Treasuries, carries a projected 6.5% real return under GMO's base forecasts versus 0.2% real for a 60/40 global benchmark. The strategy has returned +20.8% net of fees since end-2021 versus +6.8% for the 60/40 benchmark. Inker highlights specific speculative excesses including Rigetti Computing and D-Wave Quantum trading at 1,007x and 318x sales respectively, and Thinking Machines raising capital at a $50 billion valuation within roughly three months of a $10 billion raise.
Citations · 6
“On price/sales and price/book, it is at an all-time high.”
p#5 · confidence 97%
“While Palantir trades at 120 times sales, almost certainly higher than any other megacap company in history, Rigetti Computing and D-Wave Quantum trade at 1007 and 318 times sales, respectively.”
p#8 · confidence 98%
“Thinking Machines raised $2 billion earlier this year at a $10 billion valuation, apparently without telling investors what their plan was... they're raising capital at a $50 billion valuation about three months later.”
p#6 · confidence 97%
“a 60% MSCI ACWI/40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate bond portfolio has returned +6.8% since the end of 2021 vs. our Benchmark-Free Allocation Strategy's return of +20.8%, net of fees, for the same period.”
p#30 · confidence 99%
“this portfolio has risen 17.9% in 2025, more than 4.5% ahead of a 60% MSCI World/40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond portfolio and 4.1% ahead of the S&P 500. As of November 12, 2025.”
p#51 · confidence 99%
“our Benchmark-Free portfolio has an expected return of 6.5% real (if our forecasts are spot on) versus 0.2% real for a 60% MSCI ACWI/40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond portfolio. If everything turns out normal despite appearances, the portfolio has an expected return of 4.5% real.”
p#50 · confidence 98%
Follow this investor
Jeremy Grantham
GMO quarterly · market valuations and climate
More from Jeremy Grantham
Browse all →- Jeremy GranthamLetter to the Investment Committee on Private Equity (Ben Inker)
Letter
· FY2026
GMO warns that private equity portfolios face concentrated risks in low-quality, highly leveraged software companies with deteriorating manager performance persistence.
Original on gmo.com ↗2026-05-21
- Jeremy GranthamWhat Barbarians Like to Take Private (Ben Inker and John Pease)
Letter
· FY2026
GMO warns that private equity portfolios face concentrated risks in low-quality, highly leveraged software companies with deteriorating manager performance persistence.
Original on gmo.com ↗
Summarized by DailySharpe AI